ArticleSafety and health at work2026
Organizational Support for Safety and Work Ability in Healthcare Workers: A Longitudinal Study.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maintaining healthcare worker (HCW) work ability and continuing employment are critical issues. We examined the association of work ability with the previously unexamined work-environment factors of organizational support for safety (OSS) and surface-acting emotional labor (SaEL). Methods: A self-administered survey covering work-environment features recruited employees of five U.S. public-sector healthcare facilities in 2018-2019 and 2021. Linear regression on the outcome of work ability, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, focused on OSS and SaEL with additional independent variables. Results: A total of 1,059 and 1,553 surveys were collected from predominantly female HCWs; 425 answered both questionnaires. Almost two thirds of the HCWs were either non-direct care or unlicensed HCWs. Work ability scores were lower in direct-care workers versus non-direct-care workers. In multivariable regression models, OSS was positively associated with work ability, and SaEL was negatively associated, cross-sectionally at baseline and follow-up. Job strain, back pain, and safety hazards were also negatively associated with work in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, while social support and civility norms (combined) were positively associated. In the longitudinal analysis, only OSS positively predicted work ability, while SaEL had a borderline negative effect. Conclusion: The finding that OSS predicts work ability is novel. Despite high turnover, there has been little examination of risk factors for low work ability among HCWs. The importance of this organizational predictor justifies organization-level interventions to improve workplace safety. Such actions could simultaneously address and mitigate the additional risk factors of SaEL, job strain, and back pain in order to improve work ability for all groups of HCWs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.