ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Breast cancer metastasis mimicking pacemaker pocket infection: a diagnostic pitfall and long-term preservation of the cardiac implantable electronic device-a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) pocket infection is the most common infectious complication following pacemaker implantation or generator replacement and generally requires complete device and lead extraction according to current international guidelines. Nevertheless, non-infectious disorders, including malignant disease, may closely mimic pocket infection, creating a challenging differential diagnosis and potentially leading to delayed diagnosis or unnecessary CIED extraction. Neoplastic involvement of the CIED pocket is exceptionally rare. Case summary: An 81-year-old woman with a permanent VDD pacemaker implanted for symptomatic complete atrioventricular block underwent elective generator replacement in January 2020. Several months later, she developed progressive pain, erythema, and swelling over the left prepectoral generator pocket, raising suspicion of CIED pocket infection. Despite empirical antibiotic therapy and surgical pocket revision, repeated microbiological cultures remained sterile and no intraoperative evidence of infection was identified. Progressive enlargement of the lesion prompted further diagnostic investigation. Ultrasonography demonstrated a highly vascularized solid mass, while contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a lobulated soft-tissue lesion adjacent to the pacemaker generator together with bilateral pulmonary nodules, bilateral breast nodules, and multiple osteolytic skeletal lesions. Complete surgical excision of the pocket mass was performed while preserving the pacing system. Histopathological examination demonstrated metastatic well-differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma of breast origin (oestrogen receptor 95%, progesterone receptor 95%, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 score 0, Ki-67 7%). The unusually large pocket lesion represented the first clinical manifestation leading to the diagnosis of an otherwise clinically occult disseminated breast carcinoma. Following oncological staging, endocrine therapy consisting of letrozole followed by the addition of a CDK4/6 inhibitor resulted in prolonged disease control. At the most recent follow-up in 2026, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated partial regression of metastatic disease, without local recurrence, while the CIED continued to function normally. Discussion: Persistent or atypical CIED pocket lesions associated with negative microbiological investigations should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses, including foreign-body reaction. Integration of clinical assessment, microbiology, multimodality imaging, and histopathological examination may prevent unnecessary device extraction, facilitate timely oncological diagnosis, and allow successful long-term preservation of a normally functioning CIED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.