ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Admission-Based Prediction of Macrolide Resistance in Children Aged >28 Days and ≤8 Years with
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Macrolide-resistant Patients and Methods: This single-center retrospective prediction model study included hospitalized children with confirmed MPP at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University from October 2023 to October 2024. Candidate predictors were restricted to demographic and laboratory variables available at admission or during early hospitalization. Univariable analyses were followed by multivariable logistic regression with stepwise selection. Model performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and bootstrap internal validation. Results: A total of 724 children were included, of whom 146 (20.2%) were classified as having macrolide resistance. The final model included height, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB). The model showed an apparent area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.752 (95% CI, 0.711-0.793), and the optimism-corrected AUC after internal validation was 0.746. At the selected cutoff, sensitivity was 0.719, specificity was 0.680, and the negative predictive value was 0.906. Calibration and DCA suggested acceptable agreement and potential clinical usefulness within the observed sample. Conclusion: An admission-based model using height, CRP, LDH, and CK-MB showed moderate discrimination for predicting macrolide resistance in children aged >28 days and ≤8 years with MPP. The model showed a high negative predictive value and may help identify children at lower risk of molecularly confirmed macrolide resistance; molecular testing remains necessary to confirm resistance in children at higher predicted risk, and external validation is required before routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.