ArticleSafety and health at work2026
Redefining Worker Protection in the Algorithmic Era: From Algorithmic Justice to Insurance Systems for the Gig Economy.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the digital platform economy has introduced novel occupational hazards driven by algorithmic management. This short communication examines the occupational health challenges faced by gig workers in the context of algorithmic control, focusing on four key mechanisms: trade-offs between economic success and worker health, uncertainty in terms of effort and reward, unreliable assessment of job performance, and incorrect attribution of responsibility. These algorithmic hazards differ substantially from conventional occupational risks and cannot be adequately addressed by existing occupational health and safety frameworks. To address these inequities, we propose redefining occupational health and safety standards under an algorithmic justice framework. Furthermore, we suggest implementing an algorithm tax and an algorithm-dependent insurance system to establish sustainable social safety nets. These measures, along with mandatory disclosure of algorithmic management systems as 'High-Impact AI,' offer a practical regulatory pathway to enforce worker protection and fairness within the evolving legal landscape in the algorithmic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.