SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Secular temporal shifts in alexithymia among Chinese college students (2003-2024): a cross-temporal meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alexithymia constitutes a key indicator for assessing mental-health status among college students. Employing cross-temporal meta-analytic methods, the present study synthesizes repeated cross-sectional empirical data spanning 2003 to 2024 to map secular patterns of alexithymia in Chinese undergraduate samples and characterize observational temporal covariation between lagged aggregated macrosocial indicators and alexithymia-related traits. In total, 140 eligible studies involving 141723 undergraduate participants were incorporated; analyses were restricted strictly to datasets collected using the fully validated Chinese adaptation of the TAS-20 scale. Extensive between-study heterogeneity was observed for all alexithymia-related outcome measures. Univariate meta-regression detected significant positive temporal covariation of total alexithymia, Difficulty Identifying Feelings (DIF), and Difficulty Describing Feelings (DDF) with data-collection years, whereas Externally Oriented Thinking (EOT) exhibited no discernible temporal covariation. Multiple lagged macrosocial indicators showed bivariate observational covariation with elevated alexithymia scores. Multivariate adjusted meta-regression further revealed differentiated correlational profiles linking economic predictors to distinct alexithymia subdimensions. Supplementary sensitivity tests and publication-bias assessments were implemented to evaluate the robustness of these observational patterns, alongside explicit acknowledgment of methodological limitations intrinsic to observational meta-analytic research. Aggregated findings document secular increasing patterns in emotion-identification and emotion-description deficits across pooled college-student samples, as well as observational temporal covariation with multifaceted macrosocial transformations. The present results reflect population-level correlational covariation and provide no evidence for causal connections or intra-individual longitudinal shifts. Systematic review registration: This cross‑temporal meta‑analysis is observational social‑science evidence‑synthesis and falls outside the eligibility scope of the PROSPERO registry, which mainly accepts health‑intervention‑focused systematic reviews. The study protocol, full extracted dataset and reproducible analytical R‑scripts have been publicly archived on the Open Science Framework (OSF). Public accessible project URL: https://osf.io/4d5pt/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.