ArticleJCPP advances2026
Mental health and healthcare use during COVID-19 among neurodivergent youth and youth with pre-existing psychiatric disorders: A systematic review.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurodivergent youth and youth with pre-existing psychiatric disorders may have faced additional challenges in navigating the demands and restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, less is known about how mental health outcomes and psychiatric healthcare utilization differed across diagnostic groups and other youth-related factors. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on mental health symptoms and psychiatric healthcare use among youth with pre-existing conditions during the pandemic. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science and additional sources for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies with data collected between March 2020 and May 2023. Eligible studies included neurodivergent youth and/or youth with psychiatric disorders confirmed through clinician diagnosis or medical records prior to the pandemic. Given the clinical and methodological diversity of studies, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Forty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Mental health outcomes showed mixed patterns both across and within diagnostic groups, with individual studies reporting symptom increase, stability and improvements. Evidence on psychiatric healthcare utilization was more limited and suggested different patterns between service use and psychotropic medication use. Compared to boys, girls were more likely to experience COVID-related distress and increases in psychiatric service use during the pandemic. Age-related findings varied across developmental stages and outcome domains. Most studies ( Conclusion: Mental health outcomes among youth with pre-existing conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic varied both within and across diagnostic groups. Outcomes were also associated with individual, developmental, contextual and service-related factors. These findings suggest the importance of considering such factors alongside diagnosis when identifying clinical needs and planning support during large-scale societal disruptions. Evidence on psychiatric healthcare utilization remains limited. More methodologically robust research is needed to clarify mental health and healthcare-use patterns during major public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.