ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Non-pharmacological executive function interventions for children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) frequently experience executive dysfunction. Although non-pharmacological interventions are commonly recommended to address these challenges, their relative effectiveness across intervention types and executive-function domains remain unclear. We aimed to systematically compare the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for improving overall and domain-specific task-based executive function outcomes in children and adolescents with NDDs. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Comprehensive searches were performed across APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ERIC, and Embase from database inception through July 2024, with search updates subsequently completed on September 24, 2025, and August 24, 2026. Studies identified in the 24 August 2026 update were not incorporated into the existing analyses. The quantitative synthesis therefore remains based on studies identified through 24 September 2025. We included trials of participants aged 5-18 years with formally identified neurodevelopmental disorders that compared an eligible non-pharmacological intervention with another eligible intervention or control and reported performance-based executive-function outcomes; non-randomized studies and studies without an eligible task-based outcome were excluded. Eligibility was not restricted by participant sex or gender. The primary outcome was overall task-based executive-function performance at the first post-intervention assessment. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I Findings: Collectively, 2087 records were identified, and 118 studies involving 5863 participants (76.10% [4462 of 5863] male and 23.90% [1401 of 5863] female) and 141 independent intervention arms were included; 83 of the 118 studies involved populations with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The 141 intervention arms were organized into 5 broad categories for pairwise meta-analysis: computerized cognitive training, non-computerized executive function training, mindfulness training, neurofeedback training, and physical activity training. Twelve specific intervention types were investigated using frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis. Risk of bias was predominantly rated as having some concerns, the mean PEDro score was 6.93, and CINeMA confidence, informed by GRADE principles, was low overall and low or very low for most domain-specific estimates; heterogeneity for the overall pooled effect was moderate (I Interpretation: Non-pharmacological interventions may improve task-based EF performance in children and adolescents with NDDs. Computerized serious games and cognitively engaging exercise appear promising for selected EF domains, but findings should be interpreted cautiously given low certainty, heterogeneity, publication bias, and the ADHD-dominant evidence base. Future adequately powered, diagnosis-specific randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using standardized executive-function outcomes are needed to strengthen confidence in these findings and determine whether the observed intervention rankings generalize across NDDs. Funding: No funding was received for this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.