ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Beyond barriers: a qualitative TDF and COM-B analysis of participation in active ageing programmes.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Global populations are ageing rapidly, underscoring the need for strategic policy responses such as active ageing programmes (AAPs). This study examined the barriers and facilitators influencing participation in the Live Well, Age Well AAPs among both participants and non-participants, to inform future programme refinements. Methods: Purposive sampling was employed to recruit older adults aged 50 years and above from diverse participation levels, non-participants, and dropouts from the programme. A total of 28 adults (23 females and 5 males; mean age: 72.8 ± 7.1 years) were recruited, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain insights from participants. The analysis was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behavior (COM-B). Results: Analysis of interviews with 28 participants revealed motivation as a central aspect of programme participation, with capability and opportunity identified and discussed in relation to motivational factors. Willingness to participate was driven by intentions to enhance knowledge, manage well-being, and develop digital skills. Health concerns about age-related ailments motivated engagement, though some reported physical discomfort deterred participation. Self-confidence was undermined by health conditions and negative perceptions about ageing. Technology-related fears, particularly regarding scams, combined with low digital proficiency heightened anxiety. Memory difficulties and limited English literacy further impeded engagement. Environmental factors including time availability and geographical accessibility were key determinants. Social influences operated alongside environmental factors, with family encouragement promoting engagement whilst discouragement created participation barriers. Discussion: This study demonstrates how TDF and COM-B models can guide theory-informed interventions for AAPs, revealing that participation involves multiple interrelated determinants requiring targeted approaches across capability, opportunity, and motivation domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.