ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Assistive devices identified as most useful for people with Parkinson's disease - a patient-centered survey.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify everyday assistive devices perceived as most useful by people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) and their caregivers. Methods: A 45-item web-based survey was distributed through the Parkinson & Movement Disorder Alliance website and an online educational event. The survey included four respondent-characteristic items, ratings of 40 assistive devices using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not useful" to "very useful," and one free-response item. Results: A total of 293 online surveys were completed. The five devices with the highest percentages of "very useful" ratings were grab bars for shower (80%), grab bars (71%), electric toothbrushes (63%), jar openers (54%), and grabber tools (43%). Conclusions: Numerous assistive devices are available to make activities of daily living easier for PwP. Identifying which devices PwP and caregivers perceive as most useful may help clinicians prioritize practical recommendations and support greater independence in daily activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.