Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856988›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2026

Safety of benfotiamine as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and the bioavailability of benfotiamine as a source of thiamin in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC on food supplements.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Montaña Cámara, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan De Henauw, Ángeles Jos, Alexandre Maciuk, Inge Mangelsdorf, Breige McNulty and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA)
Dominique Turck
Torsten Bohn
Montaña Cámara
Jacqueline Castenmiller
Stefaan De Henauw
Ángeles Jos
Alexandre Maciuk
Inge Mangelsdorf
Breige McNulty
Androniki Naska
Kristina Pentieva
Alfonso Siani
Frank Thies
Francesco Cubadda
Thomas Frenzel
Ursula Gundert-Remy
Francesca Marcon
Harry J McArdle
Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold
Miguel Prieto Maradona
Alexandros Siskos
Matthew Wright
Gabriela Precup
Silvia Valtueña Martinez
Hanna Schmierer
Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the safety of benfotiamine as a novel food (NF) pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and on the bioavailability of benfotiamine as a source of thiamin in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC. The NF, which is produced by chemical synthesis, is proposed to be used in food supplements for adults at a maximum intake of 300 mg/day. The Panel notes that the identity of the NF has not been sufficiently demonstrated, including the possible presence of small particles and nanoparticles. The Panel also notes that the data provided were insufficient to demonstrate that the manufacturing process is reproducible and capable of consistently producing a product with the proposed characteristics. No conclusion could be drawn on the microbiological stability of the NF over the proposed shelf life. The information provided indicates that the bioavailability of thiamin from benfotiamine may be higher than that from water-soluble forms of thiamin and thus benfotiamine may be used as a source of thiamin. Owing to the insufficient characterisation of the NF, unresolved uncertainties regarding small particles, including nanoparticles, the lack of adequate information on its metabolic fate, bioaccumulation and long-term effects, and the limitations of the submitted toxicological data, the Panel concludes that the safety of benfotiamine as a NF cannot be established under the proposed conditions of use. The Panel also concludes that the higher bioavailability of benfotiamine compared with authorised or natural sources of thiamin has not been quantified to an extent that would allow the derivation of a conversion factor for labelling purposes.

Indexed as

benfotiaminefood supplementnovel foodsnutrient sourcesafety

Identifiers

PMID42856988
PMCPMC13650730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.