ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2026
Safety of benfotiamine as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and the bioavailability of benfotiamine as a source of thiamin in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC on food supplements.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the safety of benfotiamine as a novel food (NF) pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 and on the bioavailability of benfotiamine as a source of thiamin in the context of Directive 2002/46/EC. The NF, which is produced by chemical synthesis, is proposed to be used in food supplements for adults at a maximum intake of 300 mg/day. The Panel notes that the identity of the NF has not been sufficiently demonstrated, including the possible presence of small particles and nanoparticles. The Panel also notes that the data provided were insufficient to demonstrate that the manufacturing process is reproducible and capable of consistently producing a product with the proposed characteristics. No conclusion could be drawn on the microbiological stability of the NF over the proposed shelf life. The information provided indicates that the bioavailability of thiamin from benfotiamine may be higher than that from water-soluble forms of thiamin and thus benfotiamine may be used as a source of thiamin. Owing to the insufficient characterisation of the NF, unresolved uncertainties regarding small particles, including nanoparticles, the lack of adequate information on its metabolic fate, bioaccumulation and long-term effects, and the limitations of the submitted toxicological data, the Panel concludes that the safety of benfotiamine as a NF cannot be established under the proposed conditions of use. The Panel also concludes that the higher bioavailability of benfotiamine compared with authorised or natural sources of thiamin has not been quantified to an extent that would allow the derivation of a conversion factor for labelling purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.