Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856969›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026

Intact spatial learning in Fmr1

Anuj Vadher, Adrian J Duszkiewicz, Emma R Wood, Paul A Dudchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anuj VadherSchool of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Adrian J DuszkiewiczSchool of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Emma R WoodInstitute of Neuroscience and Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul A DudchenkoSchool of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: FMR1, SYNGAP1, and GRIN2B gene mutations Q8 are known causes of mild to severe intellectual disability (ID) in humans, with affected individuals frequently co-diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). These three genes influence molecular mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity, and thus spatial memory behaviors have been of interest in studying rodent models of these mutations. However, evidence of spatial memory impairment across these models is inconsistent, with some studies reporting deficits and others finding none. Method: In the present study, we used a variant of the Morris water maze that allowed explicit stimulus control of visual landmarks and examined the use of individual visual cues to navigate, using Results: We found 1) strong landmark control of spatial behavior and 2) intact learning in all three rat models. Discussion: Of general significance, our results also suggest that rats use a spatial strategy that relies on individual landmarks (at least in a directional water maze), as opposed to the configuration of landmarks, to identify the goal location.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorder (ASD)developmental disabilitiesintellectual disabilitieslandmarkspatial memorywater maze (WM)

Identifiers

PMID42856969
PMCPMC13649662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.