ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2026
Faecal calprotectin for the diagnosis of bowel inflammation in patients with rheumatologic diseases: what is new in the last 5 years (2020-2025)?
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study updated the evidence (2020-2025) on the diagnostic and prognostic value of faecal calprotectin (FC) in rheumatologic diseases, focusing on spondyloarthritis (SpA), rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases (January 2020-August 2025) was performed. Eligible studies included adults with established rheumatologic diseases reporting FC levels and their associations with gastrointestinal symptoms, endoscopic or histologic inflammation, disease activity, or incident inflammatory bowel disease. Results: In SpA, a substantial proportion of patients exhibited elevated FC levels, ranging from ∼25% to 70% depending on study design and thresholds (typically 50-250 µg/g). Several studies demonstrated concordance between elevated FC and microscopic or macroscopic intestinal inflammation. FC was frequently associated with gastrointestinal symptoms and, in some cohorts, correlated with disease activity indices and inflammatory burden. Medication exposure emerged as a key confounder, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with higher FC levels and biologic therapies generally associated with lower values. In rheumatoid arthritis, evidence remains limited but suggests that FC may be elevated in early or active disease and decrease with treatment. In fibromyalgia, limited data indicate elevated FC in symptomatic subgroups, although specificity for inflammatory processes is uncertain. Conclusions: FC is a promising noninvasive biomarker for detecting subclinical intestinal inflammation in rheumatologic diseases, particularly SpA. However, heterogeneity in study design, thresholds, and confounding factors limits its clinical applicability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.