ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026
From PCOS to PMOS: reframing the clinical pathway around insulin sensitivity and weight-neutral metabolic risk.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous condition associated with reproductive, metabolic, pregnancy, and psychological morbidity across the life course. Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) was recently proposed through a multistep global consensus process, with implementation across guidelines and health systems still under way. This Perspective argues that the clinical value of the naming proposal will depend on whether it redirects care beyond ovarian morphology and body size. Insulin resistance can serve as an actionable management hub linking reproductive endocrine dysfunction with longer-term metabolic risk in a substantial subgroup, but it is neither universal, the sole cause of the syndrome, nor a diagnostic criterion. Routine fasting insulin measurement or homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance should therefore not be introduced as diagnostic requirements. Instead, we propose a weight-neutral, insulin-sensitivity-centered, life-course pathway aligned with existing guideline recommendations. Glycemic status, lipids, blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, pregnancy planning, psychological health, and risk-directed liver assessment should be considered according to clinical guidance without using BMI as an exclusion criterion. Lifestyle intervention should be evaluated through metabolic, functional, reproductive, and quality-of-life outcomes, not weight change alone. Metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonists should remain confined to guideline-supported indications and evidence limitations. Whether PMOS improves risk recognition, guideline adherence, patient experience, or continuity of care remains to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.