ArticlePublic health challenges2026
Adherence to the Revised National Malaria Case Management Guidelines Among Healthcare Workers at Mzimba District Hospital in Northern Malawi.
Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of severe malaria among children remains a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, including Malawi. Therefore, this study examined the adherence to the national malaria case management guidelines among Malawian healthcare workers. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study that used purposive sampling to recruit nurses and clinicians in paediatric and nursery wards. Quantitative data were collected from 33 participants through a clinical observational checklist. Qualitative data were collected from 12 participants through in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 22.0, and qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The results indicated that 32/33 of the participants effectively treated under-five children with severe malaria, whereas 23/33 of the participants made incorrect diagnoses. Additionally, the general paediatric ward nurses did not appropriately monitor the patients. Most healthcare workers failed to provide adequate health education and follow-up appointments for the discharged children and their guardians due to a shortage of staff, lack of equipment and lack of commitment. Conclusion: The study suggests that there is poor adherence to the national malaria guidelines on the management of children with severe malaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.