Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856806›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2026

Iterative Co-Development of the Tripartite Joint Risk Assessment Operational Process and Tool Through Incorporating Information From Pilots in Indonesia, the United Republic of Tanzania, and Georgia.

Elizabeth Mumford, Kaylee Errecaborde, Kachen Wongsathapornchai, Ryan Aguanno, Guillaume Belot, Dana Cole, Vasily Esenamanov, Dirk Pfeiffer, Ong-Orn Prasarnphanich, Xavier Roche and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Elizabeth Mumford *School of Veterinary Medicine University of Surrey Guildford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9548-9675
Kaylee ErrecabordeWorld Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Kachen WongsathapornchaiFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Bangkok Thailand.
Ryan AguannoFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0069-5025
Guillaume BelotWorld Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Dana ColeUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8762-0414
Vasily EsenamanovHealth Emergencies Hub for the South Caucasus WHO Regional Office for Europe Tbilisi Georgia.
Dirk PfeifferCentre for Applied One Health Research and Policy Advice City University of Hong Kong Kowloon Hong Kong SAR P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-0530
Ong-Orn PrasarnphanichWorld Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Xavier RocheFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9114-8559
Ismaila SeckFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome Italy.
Tieble TraoreWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa-Dakar Emergency Hub Dakar Senegal.
Endang WulandariWorld Health Organization Indonesia Country Office Jakarta Indonesia.
Sophie von Dobschuetz *World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-1102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Zoonotic diseases pose risks to human, animal, and ecosystem health; effective management relies on coordinated actions across sectors. Although One Health principles promote collaboration across sectors, operational tools for multisectoral risk assessment (RA) are lacking. Therefore, the Tripartite (FAO, WHO, and WOAH) developed the first-ever One Health operational tool for Joint Risk Assessment (JRA-OT), with inputs from 15 pilot countries and international experts. This article describes how information from pilots in Indonesia, the United Republic of Tanzania, and Georgia contributed to informing co-development of the final JRA process and tool. Methods: Three in-person meetings with international RA and zoonotic disease experts with a One Health background were convened in Rome, Italy, to co-develop the methodology (November 2017, September 2018) and incorporate pilot feedback (February 2020). Development criteria included a standard, systematic, qualitative, and multisectoral RA process, facilitating incorporation of expert opinion and sector-specific RA results. The pilot workshops described here were conducted in Indonesia (March 2018), the United Republic of Tanzania (March 2019), and Georgia (July 2019), and feedback was incorporated iteratively into the JRA-OT by a Tripartite Secretariat. Results: These pilot workshops demonstrated JRA's utility and provided critical information for improvements. Key findings included the (1) value of policy-level risk framing, (2) importance of political will, (3) need for subnational engagement, (4) importance of including all relevant sectors, and (5) necessity of clear, stepwise guidance to facilitate efficient collaboration and support training of national trainers. Conclusions: Co-development of the JRA using country pilots and expert consultations allowed for field-testing and iterative improvement of the tool, ensuring incorporation of user requirements, robust methodology for the joint, multisectoral assessment of national zoonotic disease risks, and ownership by the different sectors. The process serves as a model for co-development of other multisectoral operational tools.

Indexed as

Joint Operational ToolsOne Healthrisk assessmentzoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42856806
PMCPMC13650255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.