ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Delayed standard care in diabetic foot ulcers: the roles of initial response pathways and non-professional health information.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delayed entry into standard diabetic foot care may reflect non-standard initial actions, inaccurate risk appraisal, and exposure to unreliable health information. Practical concerns about life after amputation may further postpone treatment decisions, but these modifiable processes remain insufficiently characterized. Objective: To examine initial response pathways, non-professional health information exposure, and post-amputation living-support concerns in relation to delayed care, disease severity, limb outcomes, and amputation decision-making. Methods: A single-center prospective explanatory mixed-methods study included 400 adults with diabetic foot ulcers from August 2024 to February 2026. Questionnaires and records assessed response pathways, information exposure, delay >7 days, clinical outcomes, and amputation concerns. Logistic regression estimated adjusted associations. Interviews with 16 purposively selected participants explained quantitative patterns, and findings were integrated. Results: Delayed care occurred in 215 patients (53.8%), and 206 (51.5%) reported non-professional information exposure. Relative to direct standard care, non-specialist care (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.07-3.85) and home-based or non-standard care (OR 4.61, 95% CI 2.35-9.04) were associated with delay; the information-exposure score was also associated (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.30-1.94). Delay was associated with Wagner grade 3-5 disease (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.43-3.32) and amputation (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.11-3.08). Among 102 amputated patients with complete decision data, 54 (52.9%) delayed the decision; living-support concerns were associated with delay (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.81). Interviews linked reduced urgency, competing information, self-treatment, and anticipated dependence or caregiving burden to these patterns. Conclusion: Delayed care reflected risk under-recognition, non-standard action, and competing information rather than inaction. Warning-sign education, service guidance, critical appraisal of health information, and structured amputation decision support may improve timely care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.