ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Comparative immunogenicity and relative vaccine efficacy of recombinant and cell culture-based influenza vaccines: Results from a randomized trial of adults in the United States, 2024-2025.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06518577 (Measuring Immunity Against Circulating Influenza Viruses), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Measuring Immunity Against Circulating Influenza Viruses: Randomized Immunogenicity Study Among US Adults Aged 18-64 Years Comparing Two Approved Influenza Vaccines
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Recombinant (RIV) and cell culture-based inactivated (ccIIV) influenza vaccines could improve seasonal influenza prevention; however, evidence is limited in how protection may differ among non-egg-based vaccines. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial of RIV versus ccIIV to compare vaccine immunogenicity in adults aged 18 to 64 years during the 2024-25 influenza season (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06518577). Active surveillance for influenza-like illness was conducted for six months post-vaccination and cumulative incidence of influenza by vaccine type was compared to estimate relative vaccine efficacy. Participants were tested for influenza by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen tests. Immunogenicity was evaluated by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), virus microneutralization (MN), and neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) assays in a subset of blood specimens collected pre-vaccination and one-month post-vaccination. Results: Among the 591 participants, 25 cases of influenza A were detected; 2.4% cumulative incidence among RIV recipients versus 6.1% among ccIIV recipients. The probability of influenza was 61% lower with RIV than ccIIV (95% confidence interval: 7 to 84). Among 151 participants, post-vaccination HAI and MN titers vaccine components were higher among RIV recipients while NAI titers were higher among ccIIV recipients. Conclusions: RIV provided better protection than ccIIV against influenza A illness in adults during the U.S. 2024-2025 season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.