Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856734›Full record

ArticlePoultry science and management2026

Novel use of far UV-C light as a surface disinfectant in the poultry industry: trials on broiler farms show reduced bacterial burden in poultry anterooms and on wellington boots.

Katharina Watson, C Laudham, D Francis, S Daniels, S Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katharina WatsonDepartment of Agricultural Science and Practice, Royal Agricultural University, Stroud Road, Cirencester, GL7 6JS UK.
C LaudhamUV Care 222, School Street, Pontyclun, CF72 9FF UK.
D FrancisUV Care 222, School Street, Pontyclun, CF72 9FF UK.
S DanielsDepartment of Agricultural Science and Practice, Royal Agricultural University, Stroud Road, Cirencester, GL7 6JS UK.
S GreenApplied Group, Barker Lane, Chesterfield, S40 1DU UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Far ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation at 222 nm has widely been shown to deactivate bacteria, viruses and fungi in in-vitro experiments. However, there are few studies testing the technology on real life surface. There are no peer reviewed studies on the efficacy and feasibility of far UV-C disinfection in real-life agricultural settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether far UV-C irradiation installations on UK broiler poultry farms could reduce bacterial surface burden. On two farms one pair of wellington boots was submitted to far UV-C irradiation at 222 nm after staff exiting the bird housing, using a purpose build disinfection box. Swabs ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s44364-026-00048-z.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiosecurityDisinfectionPoultryTechnology

Identifiers

PMID42856734
PMCPMC13649860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.