Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856722›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial ecology2026

Toward process-based inventory data for Portland clinker substitutes.

Pippa Edwards, Wilson Ricardo Leal da Silva, Paul Fennell, Rupert J Myers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pippa EdwardsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Wilson Ricardo Leal da SilvaFuller Technologies, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul FennellDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
Rupert J MyersDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-2088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cement industry must produce lower carbon cements to meet its 2050 climate goals. A key low-cost strategy to achieve this is to substitute Portland clinker in cement with lower carbon materials. However, high-quality inventory data for clinker substitutes are poorly available, which limits the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the carbon footprints of cements containing them. Here, we report the state-of-the-art inventory data for clinker substitutes, disaggregating them by unit process to facilitate comparison, improve proxy data selection, and identify gaps to inform future data collection efforts. Cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emissions for European production of the clinker substitutes and carbon footprints of composite cements defined in EN 197 are calculated. Overall, we find the degree of clinker substitution, rather than the processing of clinker substitutes, is more impactful for producing low carbon footprint cements. This work can improve the transparency of LCA studies of concrete materials, verify commercial data, and inform technology development and business decisions related to the concrete value chain. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s44498-026-00186-x.

Indexed as

Clinker substitutesInventory dataLife cycle assessmentLow carbon cementSupplementary cementitious materials

Identifiers

PMID42856722
PMCPMC13649849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.