Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

The fecal microbiota of healthy dogs fed extruded and raw meat-based diets.

Doina Solís, Magaly Toro, Paola Navarrete, Daniel A Medina, Angélica Reyes-Jara

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Doina SolísLaboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Avenida El Líbano, Macul, Santiago, Chile.
Magaly ToroJoint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (JIFSAN), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Paola NavarreteLaboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Avenida El Líbano, Macul, Santiago, Chile.
Daniel A MedinaEscuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt, Chile.
Angélica Reyes-JaraLaboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Avenida El Líbano, Macul, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional dog diets, such as extruded diets, remain common. The popularity of unconventional options, particularly raw diets, has increased over time and may differentially influence the gut microbiota. Raw diets inherently harbor higher bacterial loads, including potentially pathogenic microorganisms, raising concerns from a One Health perspective due to the close interaction among pets, humans, and the environment. The study aims were to characterize the nutritional profiles of extruded and raw diets, compare the fecal microbial composition of dogs fed extruded diets with that of dogs fed RMBDs, and evaluate microbiota differences in pathogen-carrying dogs. Extruded (

Indexed as

dog microbiotaone healthpathogen carriagepet foodpet nutritionzoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42856706
PMCPMC13649742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.