Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856701›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Combined population and patient-specific brain networks predict electrical stimulation propagation.

Sarah B Lavelle, William K S Ojemann, Marc Jaskir, Zican Zou, Carlos A Aguila, Katherine Walsh, Odile Feys, Daniel J Zhou, Kathryn A Davis, Brian Litt and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah B LavelleDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
William K S OjemannCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Marc JaskirCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Zican ZouCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Carlos A AguilaCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Katherine WalshCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Odile FeysDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Daniel J ZhouDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Kathryn A DavisDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Brian LittDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Erin C ConradDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Nishant SinhaCenter for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-4889

Funding

Ghost in the Machine: Melding Brain, Computer and BehaviorDP1NS122038 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LITT, BRIAN · 2020 to 2024
$5.7M
Training Program in Neuroengineering and MedicineT32NS091006 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Brian Litt · 2015 to 2026
$4.1M
Guiding epilepsy surgery using network models and Stereo EEGR01NS125137 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Pennsieve: Impactful Multimodal Data Sharing for Epilepsy ResearchU24NS134536 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Joost B Wagenaar · 2024 to 2026
$2.6M
Quantitative interictal networks to localize seizure generatorsK23NS121401 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Erin Conrad · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
Biomarkers to Predict Outcome from Responsive Brain Stimulation for EpilepsyR33NS125568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Kathryn Adamiak Davis · 2026 to 2026
$1.1M
Quantitative scalp and intracranial EEG in surgical planningR01NS148413 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Erin Conrad · 2026 to 2026
$646k
Scalable methods to quantify epileptic network and guide epilepsy surgeryR00NS138680 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Nishant Sinha · 2026 to 2026
$249k
NINDS NIH HHS DP1 NS122038NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS121401NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS138680NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125137NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS148413NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS125568NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS091006NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS134536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are used during intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring to probe effective connectivity and guide epilepsy surgery. However, the factors governing spatial distribution and variability of stimulation-evoked responses across patients remain incompletely understood, making it difficult to distinguish physiological variation from pathological responses. We aimed to develop interpretable models of CCEP responses that integrate normative and patient-specific features, and to assess how these relationships are influenced by distance, brain-state, and epileptogenicity. Methods: We analyzed single-pulse stimulation data from 34 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing stereo-EEG monitoring. Significant CCEP responses were defined using N1 peak amplitude. For each stimulation-response pair, we derived multimodal features capturing Euclidean distance, effective connectivity priors from F-TRACT, a published population atlas of CCEP response probabilities, normative structural connectivity and communication metrics, and patient-specific functional connectivity estimated from iEEG during baseline and pre-stimulation periods. Lasso-regularized logistic regression models were trained to predict response using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation, and feature importance was examined across spatial scales and seizure onset zone (SOZ) involvement. Results: Performance to predict stimulation-evoked responses improved with the integration of multiple feature domains, with the full model achieving the highest accuracy (median AUC = 0.84). Feature relevance varied with spatial scale: short-range responses were dominated by distance and normative priors, whereas long-range responses depended strongly on patient-specific functional connectivity, especially when measured from pre-stimulation periods. Prediction errors were significantly higher for stimulation-response pairs within the SOZ, indicating deviations from normative connectivity-response relationships in epileptogenic networks. Significance: CCEP responses reflect an interaction between spatial constraints, network architecture, and patient-specific brain state. Multimodal modeling of CCEPs provides a principled framework to interpret stimulation responses and may offer complementary markers for identifying epileptogenic networks during presurgical evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID42856701
PMCPMC13648782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.