ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Combined population and patient-specific brain networks predict electrical stimulation propagation.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are used during intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring to probe effective connectivity and guide epilepsy surgery. However, the factors governing spatial distribution and variability of stimulation-evoked responses across patients remain incompletely understood, making it difficult to distinguish physiological variation from pathological responses. We aimed to develop interpretable models of CCEP responses that integrate normative and patient-specific features, and to assess how these relationships are influenced by distance, brain-state, and epileptogenicity. Methods: We analyzed single-pulse stimulation data from 34 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing stereo-EEG monitoring. Significant CCEP responses were defined using N1 peak amplitude. For each stimulation-response pair, we derived multimodal features capturing Euclidean distance, effective connectivity priors from F-TRACT, a published population atlas of CCEP response probabilities, normative structural connectivity and communication metrics, and patient-specific functional connectivity estimated from iEEG during baseline and pre-stimulation periods. Lasso-regularized logistic regression models were trained to predict response using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation, and feature importance was examined across spatial scales and seizure onset zone (SOZ) involvement. Results: Performance to predict stimulation-evoked responses improved with the integration of multiple feature domains, with the full model achieving the highest accuracy (median AUC = 0.84). Feature relevance varied with spatial scale: short-range responses were dominated by distance and normative priors, whereas long-range responses depended strongly on patient-specific functional connectivity, especially when measured from pre-stimulation periods. Prediction errors were significantly higher for stimulation-response pairs within the SOZ, indicating deviations from normative connectivity-response relationships in epileptogenic networks. Significance: CCEP responses reflect an interaction between spatial constraints, network architecture, and patient-specific brain state. Multimodal modeling of CCEPs provides a principled framework to interpret stimulation responses and may offer complementary markers for identifying epileptogenic networks during presurgical evaluation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.