ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026
Landscape of cancer genomics and precision oncology in Japan, South Korea, China, and Australia.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision oncology has expanded rapidly across the Asia-Pacific region, yet implementation remains heterogeneous because of differences in health-system organisation, reimbursement, molecular tumour board infrastructure, workforce capacity, and data integration. This structured narrative review with expert consultation compares precision oncology ecosystems in Japan, South Korea, China, and Australia to identify common challenges and implementation strategies across the patient pathway. Although each country has established distinctive genomic medicine programmes, major disparities persist in access to comprehensive genomic profiling, molecularly matched therapies, and longitudinal data infrastructure. Comparative analysis highlights that successful implementation depends not only on sequencing capacity but also on coordinated governance, reimbursement alignment, multidisciplinary decision-making, research integration, and equitable access. Particular attention is required for geographically underserved populations and patients with rare or paediatric cancers. Based on these findings, we propose seven prioritised policy recommendations to strengthen precision oncology implementation, emphasising regional collaboration, interoperable data systems, workforce development, and sustainable reimbursement strategies to improve equity and clinical impact across the Asia-Pacific region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.