ReviewChinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine2026
Therapeutic vaccines for NSCLC: From mechanisms to clinical translation.
Review in Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), durable disease control remains elusive for most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly those with advanced-stage disease. Therapeutic cancer vaccines offer the potential for sustained immune surveillance by inducing tumor-specific effector and memory T-cell responses. However, their clinical benefits have been inconsistent to date. In advanced disease, rapid tumor progression, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), defective antigen presentation, and immune escape collectively impair the infiltration, persistence, and cytotoxic function of vaccine-induced T cells. These biological factors suggest that vaccine activity may depend on a therapeutic window characterized by lower tumor burden, preserved antigen presentation, and limited immunosuppression. Combination strategies with ICIs, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy are being investigated to increase antigen release and reduce TME-mediated immunosuppression. Vaccine development has also expanded beyond shared tumor-associated antigens to include personalized and shared tumor-specific antigens, as well as multi-epitope designs intended to improve immunogenicity and patient selection. Nonetheless, antigen heterogeneity, immune editing, manufacturing timelines, and the safety of combination regimens remain key translational challenges. Therapeutic vaccines may therefore be viewed as immunomodulatory agents whose long-term value in NSCLC will depend on antigen selection, treatment timing, and integration with multimodal therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.