ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a common valvular heart condition and has no effective medical therapy. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), characterized by the acquisition of somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells which provides a selection advantage, has been associated with incident aortic stenosis (AS), particularly when driven by Methods: We evaluated the association of CHIP and gene-specific CHIP subtypes with AS in the UK Biobank (UKB) and with aortic valve hemodynamics in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study to prioritize gene driver mutations for mechanistic study. We then generated human Results: Among 449,109 individuals in the UKB with whole exome sequencing, large CHIP clones and non- Conclusions: Integrating human cohort data with experimental evidence using
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.