ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Toward a theory of STEM academic departments as racialized organizations.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical and STEM higher education scholars document how the fallacy of White supremacy has produced racialized macro-level (e.g., state) and micro-level (e.g., individual) structures gatekeeping the self-actualization and innovation of racially minoritized people and their communities. Although important, there has been an undertheorization of how meso-level structures like STEM academic departments gatekeep racially minoritized people and their knowledge systems. In this paper, we leverage theory of racialized organizations to illustrate how STEM academic departments in United States research-intensive, predominantly White institutions (PWIs) function as organizational sites of racial inequity. We use critical theory and empirical studies to explain how this racialized gatekeeping occurs through four structures: (1) graduate admissions and faculty hiring, (2) research, (3) instruction, and (4) service. Overall, this paper provides a conceptual and practical blueprint of how STEM academic departments, through their organizational rules and routines, maintain White racially hierarchies in STEM ecosystems. We conclude by offering examples of how STEM academic departments can engage, challenge, and disrupt their racially exclusionary organizational practices, so racially minoritized people and knowledge systems can survive and thrive in STEM ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.