ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Added effects of dual-task water-based exercise on global cognition and physical performance in older women: a three-arm randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dual-task water-based exercise has been proposed to enhance attention and executive functions and yield cognitive benefits beyond conventional aquatic aerobics exercise. However, evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, as few randomized controlled trials have directly compared dual-task aquatic interventions with conventional aquatic program of equivalent dose in older women. Methods: This three-arm, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in Porto Alegre, Brazil, at ESEFID/UFRGS. Older women were allocated to: dual-task water-based exercise (WEDT), conventional water-based exercise (WE), or a non-exercise control group (CG). The intervention lasted 14 weeks (2 sessions/week). Global cognition (MoCA total score) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included specific cognitive measures, mobility (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and dual-task TUG [TUG-DT]), aerobic capacity, muscular performance, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and rectus femoris and vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses used generalized estimating equations (GEE) with Bonferroni Results: Of 186 individuals screened, 67 were randomized (WEDT n=23; WE n=23; CG n=21). Mean attendance in ITT was 55.2% ± 10.36% (WEDT) and 65.7% ± 9.89% (WE), and no intervention-related adverse events were reported. In ITT, MoCA total score showed no main effects of time or group and no group×time interaction (p>0.05); among MoCA domains, only orientation showed a main effect of time (p=0.006). Semantic verbal fluency showed a significant group×time interaction (p=0.003), increasing in WEDT, decreasing in WE, and remaining stable in CG. TUG showed no significant effects (p>0.05), whereas TUG-DT showed a significant group×time interaction (p=0.032), driven by improvements in CG. A significant main effect of group was observed for the 6-min walk test (p=0.020). Neuromuscular outcomes showed significant group×time interactions for handgrip strength (p=0.037; increases in WE), MVIC (p=0.014), and rectus femoris activation (p=0.028). Conclusions: In older women, adding periodized dual-task demands to aquatic aerobics did not provide consistent incremental benefits for global cognition, while physical effects were modest and heterogeneous. These findings should be interpreted considering the moderate adherence and reduced intervention dose actually received; future trials should evaluate higher training doses and strategies to enhance adherence and monitoring. Trial registration: RBR-4tzrdjz.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.