Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856508›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Simulated Targeted Anthelmintic Treatment Maintains Dung Removal but Not Dung-Inhabiting Insect Communities.

Samuel Appleyard-Sanderson, Miguel Lurgi, Richard Wall, Christopher F Clements

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel Appleyard-SandersonSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0516-1280
Miguel LurgiDepartment of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-895X
Richard WallSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.
Christopher F ClementsSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5677-5401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensive use of antiparasitic treatments, such as macrocyclic lactones, is known to affect non-target dung-inhabiting insects, leading to reduced community functioning and ecosystem services. We describe the development of a spatially explicit simulation to assess the effects of the treatment of different proportions of a livestock herd with anthelmintics, a strategy known as targeted selective treatment. We simulated the treatment of a varying proportion of a livestock herd with antiparasitics, and the effects inflicted on three dung-inhabiting insect guilds (flies, endocoprids and paracoprids) with novel life cycle, colonisation and dispersal mechanisms. We varied livestock stocking density to test the effect of dung availability on these effects. Complex population-level effects were seen as treatment varied, while increased stocking densities led to smaller community sizes overall. Dung removal, measured by total pat number and mean pat biomass, increased with decreasing livestock treatment at all stocking densities. These findings provide a theoretical basis for promoting targeted selective treatment with antiparasitics in an effort to balance livestock production and animal welfare with biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

Indexed as

ecosysteminhabiting insectslivestock managementmacrocyclic lactonemodellingnon‐target effects

Identifiers

PMID42856508
PMCPMC13649371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.