ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Futures literacy as a research tool for socio-material revaluation in sufficiency-oriented climate mitigation.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demand-side climate mitigation requires methodological approaches capable of interrogating how everyday material practices are shaped by anticipatory assumptions about the future. While decluttering has been discussed as a potential entry point for sufficiency-oriented consumption, existing approaches largely focus on individual reflection and functional evaluation, leaving collective and anticipatory dimensions underexplored. This article develops and systematizes an adapted Futures Literacy Lab (FLL) as a methodological framework for examining socio-material revaluation processes in the context of stored household consumer goods. Building on Futures Literacy theory, the method operationalizes revaluation through structured phases-Reveal, Reframe, and Rethink-supplemented by an optional Act phase. Through developmantalworkshops, three ideal-typical workshop formats were derived: contextual thematic futures, object-centered future projection, and scenario-based reframing. Rather than presuming immediate behavioral change, the framework makes anticipatory assumptions visible and negotiable through collective intelligence knowledge creation, thereby expanding interpretative space relevant to sufficiency transitions. The article contributes a transferable methodological approach for investigating and facilitating socio-material revaluation in high-consumption contexts, positioning anticipatory imagination as a complementary tool within climate mitigation and just transition research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.