Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856476›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Food competition, but not other common assays, reveals social dominance in female and male CD1 mice.

Elizabeth Illescas-Huerta, Hannah Casselman, Logan Taylor, Sequioa Smith, Nancy Padilla-Coreano

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth Illescas-HuertaUniversity of Florida.
Hannah CasselmanUniversity of Florida.
Logan TaylorUniversity of Florida.
Sequioa SmithUniversity of Florida.
Nancy Padilla-CoreanoUniversity of Florida.

Funding

Elucidating social competence: neural mechanisms for competition and cooperationR01MH139895 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Nancy Padilla Coreano · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH139895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social dominance is fundamental to social organization across species and plays a critical role in shaping behavior, physiology, and health. Despite the complexity of social organization, researchers have successfully developed animal models to investigate social dominance under controlled experimental conditions across a variety of species, including male rodents. However, measures of social rank among female mice remain poorly understood, limiting the generalizability of commonly used social dominance assays. Here, we systematically evaluated four commonly used behavioral assays of social dominance in female CD1 mice and directly compared their performance with that observed in males. We found that three traditional assays-agonistic behavior, urine marking, and the tube test-failed to distinguish social rank in female CD1 mice. In contrast, the food competition task reliably identified social ranks in both female and male CD1 mice, revealing linear dominance hierarchies and demonstrating that this assay effectively assesses social dominance across sexes in an outbred mouse strain. By systematically comparing multiple behavioral assays in female and male CD1 mice, our study expands the current understanding of how social dominance is expressed across sexes and establishes a valuable platform for future studies aimed at uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying social hierarchy.

Indexed as

female micefood competitionsocial behaviorSocial dominancesocial hierarchy

Identifiers

PMID42856476
PMCPMC13648840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.