Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856442›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Trends in transitions in cigarette and electronic nicotine vapor product use in the Rutgers Omnibus Study, 2022-2026.

Olivia K Roberts, Michelle T Bover Manderski, Nishi J Gonsalves, Jihyoun Jeon, Rafael Meza, Cristine D Delnevo, Andrew F Brouwer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia K RobertsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-1582-2174
Michelle T Bover ManderskiDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-221X
Nishi J GonsalvesRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-4903
Jihyoun JeonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-3412
Rafael MezaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037
Cristine D DelnevoRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9597-4307
Andrew F BrouwerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-5287

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Mendez Emilien · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
Rutgers Center of Excellence in Rapid Surveillance of TobaccoU01CA278695 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CRISTINE D DELNEVO, Ollie Ganz · 2023 to 2026
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA278695NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Monitoring transitions in cigarette and electronic nicotine vapor product (ENVP) use is important for understanding how marketplace and regulatory changes have affected product use patterns, but information from national surveys is often delayed by several years. Methods: The Rutgers Omnibus Study is a quarterly serial, rapid-response, web-based convenience survey. Using a Markov multistate transition model, we estimated transition rates and one-year transition probabilities between never, non-current, ENVP-only, cigarette-only, and dual use among 5,292 adults aged 18-45 who participated in at least two of Waves 1-16 (February 2022-February 2026), as well as overall transition hazard ratios by sex, age group, and race & ethnicity in a multivariable model. Results: About 40% of individuals using cigarettes (39.5%; 95% CI: 36.9-42.0) or ENVP (40.1%; 95% CI: 36.4-43.7), and 60% of those using both products (60.8%; 95% CI: 58.3-63.2) were predicted to remain in those states after one year. Female participants began using cigarettes from never use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29-0.66) or non-current use (aHR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48-0.88) at lower rates than male participants. Participants aged 35-45 years initiated ENVP-only use from non-current use (aHR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.23-0.51) at a lower rate than those aged 18-34 years. Compared to non-Hispanic White participants, non-Hispanic Black participants initiated ENVP-only use from never use at a higher rate (aHR 4.39; 95% CI: 2.09-9.25). Conclusion: Rapid response surveys can provide important preliminary information on tobacco use transition patterns while we wait for the slower release of nationally representative survey data.

Indexed as

adultcigarettedual useelectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)electronic nicotine vapor product (ENVP)multistate transition modeltobaccotransition

Identifiers

PMID42856442
PMCPMC13648781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.