ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Translating functional brain activity between humans and monkeys.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparing brain responses across species is essential for identifying models of human cognition and testing theories of brain evolution, but differences in brain size, measurement techniques, and signal dynamics make it challenging. Here we collected dense fMRI data in macaques and humans using the same movies, static-image sequences, and tasks, and developed a multivariate analysis method that aligns neural representations temporally and spatially. The resulting data-driven framework provides a quantitative translation of brain responses among individuals and between species. Using this framework, we uncovered a broadly conserved cross-species hierarchy of retinotopic visual areas and whole-brain correspondence. Yet within this structure, we found that higher-order macaque areas shared more information with lower-order human areas, particularly during movies, providing evidence of species differences. We also identified potential macaque precursors to human regions involved in high-level cognition, including theory-of-mind and reading. These results offer a blueprint for common representational principles across species.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.