ReviewEndocrinology2026
Antioxidant therapy, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, effects on pancreatic β cells: therapeutic promise or potential harm?
Review in Endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) is a widely used antioxidant with increasing public interest in its use for treating metabolic disease, yet its effects on pancreatic β cells remain incompletely understood. Most studies focus on NAC's benefits under pathological conditions-such as obesity, high-fat diet exposure, and type 2 diabetes-where oxidative stress impairs β-cell function, identity, and survival. In these contexts, NAC can reduce oxidative damage, preserve insulin secretion, and limit islet fibrosis. However, far fewer studies examine NAC under normal physiological or aging conditions, where moderate reactive oxygen species levels are required for β-cell signaling and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Emerging evidence shows that excessive antioxidant exposure during non-pathological states may disrupt redox-dependent pathways, suppress insulin biosynthesis and exocytosis, and contribute to reductive stress. Here, we review the current evidence of NAC's impact on β cells across physiological, aging, and pathological settings. Moreover, we highlight that NAC can be protective or detrimental depending on redox state, metabolic environment, and dosing, which emphasizes the need for careful consideration of antioxidant use in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.