Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856070›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

The Early Burn Wound Microbiome, Not Donor-Site Transfer, Marks Graft Healing Outcome.

Elad Zvi, Carina Chi, Thinh Sieu Tang, Sriya Bobba, Melissa Neely, Roxanne Chatzis, Johannes S Kern, Shiva Akbarzadeh, Céline Pattaroni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elad ZviVictorian Adult Burns Service, Bayside Health (The Alfred), Melbourne, Australia.
Carina ChiVictorian Adult Burns Service, Bayside Health (The Alfred), Melbourne, Australia.
Thinh Sieu TangVictorian Adult Burns Service, Bayside Health (The Alfred), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4145-2385
Sriya BobbaVictorian Adult Burns Service, Bayside Health (The Alfred), Melbourne, Australia.
Melissa NeelyVictorian Adult Burns Service, Bayside Health (The Alfred), Melbourne, Australia.
Roxanne ChatzisDepartment of Immunology, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Johannes S KernDepartment of Immunology, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shiva AkbarzadehVictorian Adult Burns Service, Bayside Health (The Alfred), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2787-3317
Céline PattaroniDepartment of Immunology, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9920-1181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healing after split-skin grafting remains difficult to anticipate in small-area burns, particularly when wounds show no clinically diagnosed infection. We tested whether the burn wound microbiome before grafting captures early wound states linked to subsequent healing. Twenty-six adults with mid-dermal to full-thickness burns involving < 10% total body surface area underwent longitudinal sampling at surgery, graft check and clinic review. At surgery, swabs were collected from the burn wound before grafting, the split-skin donor site and anatomically matched uninjured control skin. Across 170 infection-free samples, microbiome profiling showed that pre-grafting burn wounds already had reduced microbial diversity and distinct community structure compared with matched control skin. This baseline dysbiosis included depletion of commensal-associated anaerobes, including Finegoldia and Anaerococcus and enrichment of opportunistic burn-associated taxa, including Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Donor sites acquired a related wound-like microbiome and remodelled in parallel with burn wounds during healing, but post-grafting burn microbiota were not preferentially similar to matched donor sites, arguing against a donor-to-burn microbial transfer. The clearest clinical signal was present before grafting: lower burn wound diversity at surgery was associated with delayed healing, and baseline community structure differed in wounds that later required regrafting. These findings suggest that the pre-grafting burn wound microbiome may provide an early, infection-independent marker of healing trajectory and should be tested as a predictive biomarker in larger prospective cohorts.

Indexed as

BurnsMicrobiotaSkin TransplantationTransplant Donor SiteWound HealingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin Microbiome

Identifiers

PMID42856070
PMCPMC13653241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.