ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
The Early Burn Wound Microbiome, Not Donor-Site Transfer, Marks Graft Healing Outcome.
Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healing after split-skin grafting remains difficult to anticipate in small-area burns, particularly when wounds show no clinically diagnosed infection. We tested whether the burn wound microbiome before grafting captures early wound states linked to subsequent healing. Twenty-six adults with mid-dermal to full-thickness burns involving < 10% total body surface area underwent longitudinal sampling at surgery, graft check and clinic review. At surgery, swabs were collected from the burn wound before grafting, the split-skin donor site and anatomically matched uninjured control skin. Across 170 infection-free samples, microbiome profiling showed that pre-grafting burn wounds already had reduced microbial diversity and distinct community structure compared with matched control skin. This baseline dysbiosis included depletion of commensal-associated anaerobes, including Finegoldia and Anaerococcus and enrichment of opportunistic burn-associated taxa, including Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Donor sites acquired a related wound-like microbiome and remodelled in parallel with burn wounds during healing, but post-grafting burn microbiota were not preferentially similar to matched donor sites, arguing against a donor-to-burn microbial transfer. The clearest clinical signal was present before grafting: lower burn wound diversity at surgery was associated with delayed healing, and baseline community structure differed in wounds that later required regrafting. These findings suggest that the pre-grafting burn wound microbiome may provide an early, infection-independent marker of healing trajectory and should be tested as a predictive biomarker in larger prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.