ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
The degree and direction of subgenome expression bias in Brassica napus vary between cultivars, tissues and developmental stages.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most extant plant lineages show evidence of past polyploidisation events in their genomes. Allopolyploids arise from hybridisation, resulting in polyploid genomes comprising subgenomes from different ancestors. Adaptation to their environment, pre- and post-hybridisation and selection for specific traits has led to several allopolyploids exhibiting an unequal contribution from their subgenomes to phenotypic traits. Associated regulatory changes may have given rise to cultivar-specific subgenome dominance that contributes to the diversity of phenotypes. Likewise, different tissues and developmental stages have distinct expression profiles that may exhibit higher contributions from one subgenome relative to the other. Here, we investigate different metrics for quantifying the contribution of each subgenome to expression in cultivars of Brassica napus, in space (tissue) and time (development). Brassica napus inherited two subgenomes, A and C, from its ancestors Brassica rapa (A) and Brassica oleracea (C). We find that the C subgenome has a larger contribution to transcript abundance than the A subgenome, whereas the mean abundance per expressed gene is higher for the A subgenome. Direct comparison of homoeologous pairs reveals higher expression of genes on the C subgenome. We find that the degree and direction of expression bias can change substantially within a homoeologous pair between cultivars, tissues and across development, suggesting that subgenome dominance is highly dynamic. The quantification of expression bias reveals a strong dependence on the metric and on classification thresholds. These findings help explain contradictory reports on expression bias and subgenome dominance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.