Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42856005›Full record

ReviewEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture.

Iqbal Singh Bhalla, Philip A Loring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iqbal Singh BhallaDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5611-8361
Philip A LoringDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-2331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we articulate several important but often overlooked concepts, trends, and perspectives in the biodiversity monitoring space, specifically in the context of transforming agriculture and the wider food system. We describe the common approaches to biodiversity monitoring-those focused on species, communities, functions, habitats, etc.-and the methods and tools commonly used to track change. We then describe a set of fundamental ecological principles that are often overlooked by practitioners entering the agrobiodiversity space for the first time, particularly those with technical, industrial, and policy expertise in agriculture-adjacent fields who seek to incorporate biodiversity into their research and operations. For these practitioners, we discuss the importance of abundance, the timelines along which population trends can be quantitatively established, the geographical scales at which ecological interactions play out, and the implications therein for anyone looking to monitor the effect of farm management practices. We attempt to describe the complexities that arise when navigating the intersection of ecological, agricultural, and social systems, highlighting the multiple sets of voices, values, and priorities that come into play in this space. From intergovernmental panels to individual farmers, the agrobiodiversity space holds a multitude of arenas where decisions are made. We raise the question of "why, how, and for whom are we monitoring biodiversity?" to encourage practitioners new to this space to consider the implications of their approach. Finally, we discuss the conflicts and trade-offs that emerge in the intersection of productivity, profits, carbon, and biodiversity, and explore the challenges in finding a balance between them in the transition toward a more sustainable form of agriculture.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental Monitoringagroecosystemsbiodiversity conservationbiodiversity monitoringfood systems transformationsocial‐ecological systemssustainability transitions

Identifiers

PMID42856005
PMCPMC13653224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.