ArticleJournal of separation science2026
Immobilization of Pepsin on Different Nanomaterials and Its Application in Obtaining Bioactive Peptides.
Article in Journal of separation science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enzyme immobilization is frequently used in catalytic processes as an alternative to improve enzyme activity and stability. Among the materials used as a support, nanomaterials have been successfully reported in the literature, mainly due to its high specific area. In this study, the nanomaterials graphene, reduced graphene oxide, boron nitride nanosheets, and gold nanoparticles were evaluated as a support for pepsin immobilization. The effectiveness of this process was evaluated by the content of immobilized protein and activity of immobilized pepsin, determined through casein hydrolysis, as well as circular dichroism to verify possible alterations in enzyme structure. The antioxidant properties of hydrolysates were assessed by DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, and β-carotene. All the materials studied presented a high efficiency of immobilization, with over 80% of the pepsin content bound to the support, the use of graphene derivatives as support led to a reduction in proteolytic activity, with the immobilized pepsin retaining only 6% of its activity. The 45 nm gold nanoparticle led to an increase in proteolytic activity from 0.050 to 0.104 U. No effect of amino group functionalization of boron nitride nanosheet was observed. The variations determined in the secondary structure, especially in the β-sheet content, corroborate the variations in activity after immobilization. The change in casein hydrolysates using pepsin immobilized in nanomaterials can be verified by reversed-phase chromatography. This change in the enzyme conformation affects the antioxidant properties of the casein hydrolysates. The results found in the present study contribute to the development of new biocatalysts based on the immobilization of enzymes in nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.