Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42855995›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026

Temporal phenotypic responses of early vegetative maize to heat, drought, and combined stresses.

Anna L Casto, Katherine M Murphy, Alejandra L Quinones, Joshua Sumner, Tess Rogers, Leonardo W Lima, Malia A Gehan, Cory Hirsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna L Casto *Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 N. Warson Rd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63132, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9597-0514
Katherine M Murphy *Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 N. Warson Rd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63132, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-4274
Alejandra L Quinones *Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0603-491X
Joshua SumnerDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 N. Warson Rd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63132, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3399-9063
Tess RogersDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 N. Warson Rd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63132, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0719-7333
Leonardo W LimaDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 N. Warson Rd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63132, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1507-8877
Malia A GehanDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 N. Warson Rd., St. Louis, Missouri, 63132, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3238-2627
Cory HirschDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-758X

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67013-36129National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67021-36467National Institute of Food and Agriculture MIN-22-086National Science Foundation 2109387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how maize responds to heat, drought, and the combination of stresses is essential for developing resilient cultivars for future climates. We characterized temporal phenotypic responses of 47 genetically diverse Zea mays inbred lines grown under control, drought, heat, and combined drought-heat stresses for 13 days in a high-throughput phenotyping platform. Plant area was modeled over time using Bayesian hierarchical growth analysis. Treatment explained the largest proportion of phenotypic variance, while genotype × treatment interaction accounted for up to 35% of color variation. Growth and development responses were strongly genotype-dependent, and combined-stress responses were more closely related to heat rather than drought responses. Heat primarily reduced height and impacted growth but not development, whereas drought reduced leaf number and greenness and impacted both growth and development, indicating distinct physiological effects. Despite strong genotype effects, subpopulation explained differences only in drought responses. In follow-up experiments, these early vegetative stresses had a significant impact on days to anthesis and plant area even long after the stresses had stopped. Collectively, these results emphasize that combined-stress tolerance cannot be inferred from a single-stress, and that there is potential for improving early environmental stress tolerance that will impact later plant phenotypes.

Indexed as

Zea maysDrought ResistanceDroughtsGenotypeHot TemperaturePhenotypePlant LeavesStress, Physiologicalabiotic stressdroughtheathigh‐throughput phenotypingimage analysismaizetemperatureZea mays

Identifiers

PMID42855995
PMCPMC13653223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.