ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Bottlenecked but Booming: Strong Inbreeding in a Highly Invasive Freshwater Mussel.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bottlenecked but Booming: Strong Inbreeding in a Highly Invasive Freshwater Mussel.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 'genetic paradox of invasions' refers to successful invasive populations originating from low founder numbers. Theory predicts that such invaders should exhibit reduced genetic diversity and increased inbreeding, which should restrict their evolutionary potential and often lead to inbreeding depression. Here, we provide evidence for an invader succeeding against these odds by demonstrating strikingly strong inbreeding in a highly successful, invasive freshwater mussel. Using whole-genome resequencing data, we show that zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) from thriving invasive populations carry numerous and long runs of homozygosity (ROH) in their genomes, reflecting severe, sequential founder events followed by inbreeding during the invasion process. Additionally, predicted genetic load (accumulation of deleterious mutations) is correlated with inbreeding levels: more inbred invasive populations exhibit lower masked (i.e., heterozygous) but higher realised (i.e., homozygous) load compared to less inbred populations. These genomic consequences of inbreeding would be expected to decrease the fitness of invasives, but here have not prevented their success. Our study thus challenges conventional expectations that inbreeding and high numbers of putatively deleterious alleles should limit biological invasion success. This research provides a compelling example of an invader that defies genetic expectations, and is therefore broadly relevant for understanding invasion success and dynamics across taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.