ReviewBiomarker research2026
Beyond a cancer stem cell marker: molecular state dependent functions of CD133 and state targeted therapy.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD133 (prominin-1) is among the most widely used cancer stem cell markers, yet two decades of research have yielded persistent contradictions: CD133-negative cells can be tumorigenic, CD133-positive and -negative states can interconvert, and CD133 perturbation produces opposing phenotypes across models, while CD133 directed therapies have encountered toxicities consistent with on-target/off-tumor effects. We propose that these inconsistencies share a common origin: CD133 positivity does not define a homogeneous functional entity. Rather, the functional identity of CD133 is jointly encoded by PROM1 alternative splicing, post translational modification combinations, and subcellular localization. Depending on this molecular state, the same protein can support stemness, drive migration and invasion, sustain quiescence like states, suppress autophagy, or be exported as vesicular signals that remodel the tumor microenvironment. CD133 is therefore better understood not as a static marker with a fixed function, but as a state dependent functional integrator, in which detected expression need not reflect pathogenic function. This distinction matters therapeutically: eliminating CD133-positive cells and disrupting pathogenic CD133 states are not equivalent objectives. CD133 directed therapy should accordingly shift from marker targeting to state targeting, guided by a state resolved stratification scheme that matches isoform-, phosphorylation-, glycosylation- and localization- defined CD133 states to rational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.