Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42855738›Full record

ReviewBiomarker research2026

Beyond a cancer stem cell marker: molecular state dependent functions of CD133 and state targeted therapy.

Lin Cheng, Jingyan Wang, Yaqiong Liu, Timothy O'Brien, Janusz Krawczyk, Laura Barkley, Shanye Yin, Sanbing Shen, JunPeng Li, Sifang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lin Cheng *Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese & Western Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jingyan Wang *Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), Biomedical Sciences Building, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Yaqiong Liu *Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), Biomedical Sciences Building, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Timothy O'BrienRegenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), Biomedical Sciences Building, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Janusz KrawczykDepartment of Haematology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Laura BarkleyLambe Institute for Translational Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Shanye YinDepartment of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Sanbing ShenRegenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), Biomedical Sciences Building, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. sanbing.shen@universityofgalway.ie.
JunPeng LiDepartment of Emergency Surgery, Jilin Provincial People's Hospital, Changchun, Jilin, China. li.junpeng.t1@dc.tohoku.ac.jp.
Sifang ZhangDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese & Western Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. sifangzhang2005@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD133 (prominin-1) is among the most widely used cancer stem cell markers, yet two decades of research have yielded persistent contradictions: CD133-negative cells can be tumorigenic, CD133-positive and -negative states can interconvert, and CD133 perturbation produces opposing phenotypes across models, while CD133 directed therapies have encountered toxicities consistent with on-target/off-tumor effects. We propose that these inconsistencies share a common origin: CD133 positivity does not define a homogeneous functional entity. Rather, the functional identity of CD133 is jointly encoded by PROM1 alternative splicing, post translational modification combinations, and subcellular localization. Depending on this molecular state, the same protein can support stemness, drive migration and invasion, sustain quiescence like states, suppress autophagy, or be exported as vesicular signals that remodel the tumor microenvironment. CD133 is therefore better understood not as a static marker with a fixed function, but as a state dependent functional integrator, in which detected expression need not reflect pathogenic function. This distinction matters therapeutically: eliminating CD133-positive cells and disrupting pathogenic CD133 states are not equivalent objectives. CD133 directed therapy should accordingly shift from marker targeting to state targeting, guided by a state resolved stratification scheme that matches isoform-, phosphorylation-, glycosylation- and localization- defined CD133 states to rational interventions.

Indexed as

Cancer stem cellsCD133Post-translational modificationsProminin-1State-targeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID42855738
PMCPMC13651184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.