ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026
The prevalence of harmful traditional umbilical cord care practices and associated factors in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHarmful umbilical cord care practices remain a major public health concern in various developing countries, contributing significantly to neonatal sepsis, which accounts for approximately 15% of all neonatal deaths globally. Despite known health risks, many caregivers continue to rely on traditional methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the national prevalence of such practices and identify associated factors.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for publications from 2012 to September 2025. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics and Cochran's Q test, and a random-effects model was applied. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test, with subgroup analyses conducted to explore heterogeneity among studies.
resultsA total of 15 studies with 15,368 study participants were used for analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of harmful traditional umbilical cord care practices in newborns was 31.63% (95% CI: 25.07, 38.19). Types of harmful substances applied on the cord: the pooled prevalence of butter is 34.24%; Vaseline petroleum jelly, 25.14%; body lotion, 6.64%; ash, 26.28%; food oil, 35.05%; cow dung, 8.81%; and ointment, 42.08%, respectively. Being delivered at home (pooled adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 3.74 (95% CI: 1.33, 7.15)) and uneducated mothers (AOR = 3.22 (95% CI: 2.13, 4.31)) were significantly associated with the prevalence of harmful traditional umbilical cord care practices. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The prevalence of harmful traditional cord care was notably high as compared to WHO recommendations. Home delivery and uneducated mothers contribute significantly to the prevalence of harmful traditional cord care practices in the nation. These findings revealed that combating neonatal sepsis requires moving beyond hospital walls; we must bridge the health literacy gap for uneducated mothers and aggressively encourage institutional deliveries to replace lethal traditions with lifesaving cord care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855722What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.