ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026
Early-life microbial contact with adult hens modulates cecal microbiota and mitigates host responses to lipopolysaccharide-induced stress in broilers.
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn commercial production, the absence of adult hens disrupts natural gut colonization, forcing chicks to rely on environmental microbes and potentially compromising the ecological succession essential for health. This study investigated whether early-life adult hen microbial contact could optimize the intestinal community and metabolite profiles, thereby mitigating lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced immunological stress in broilers. Accordingly, 128 one-day-old broilers were assigned to control or adult hen microbial contact groups. Hens were removed on D 10, and LPS was administered on D 18 and D 20, resulting in a 2 × 2 factorial design.
resultsAdult hen microbial contact did not affect body weight or ileal histomorphology on D 10 or D 21. However, it reshaped the alpha diversity (P < 0.05) and beta diversity (P < 0.05) of the cecal microbiota, enriching beneficial genera such as Bacteroides, Prevotellaceae, Rikenellaceae, Muribaculaceae, and Megasphaera, although these were not primarily established through direct adult hen transfer. These microbial alterations were accompanied by increased production of cecal volatile fatty acids (P < 0.05) and altered tryptophan metabolism (P < 0.05), characterized by the conversion of serum tryptophan to indoleacetic acid. In the ileum, the adult hen microbial contact upregulated (P < 0.05) genes associated with mucosal barrier integrity (MUC13, CLDN2) and antioxidant defense (SOD2, FOXO1), while independently downregulating (P < 0.05) hepatic genes involved in redox regulation and autophagy (GRX5, LC3-1). LPS challenge induced a pronounced (P < 0.05) antioxidant imbalance in the ileum, characterized by the downregulation of CAT and NRF2, together with elevated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL8, IFNA, TNFA), compromising barrier function (MUC13, CLDN2). Concurrently, the LPS challenge increased (P < 0.05) the expression of hepatic genes involved in redox regulation and autophagy (GRX5, LC3-1), consistent with a systemic stress response. Notably, microbial contact attenuated the LPS-induced reduction in valeric acid (P < 0.05), suggesting a protective effect on microbial metabolite production under immunological stress.
conclusionAdult hen microbial contact did not improve growth performance or ileal histomorphology, but shaped the early-life gut microbiota and associated metabolite profiles, contributing to improved resilience to subsequent immune challenges in broilers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.