ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Patient engagement in protocol development for rare disease clinical trials: a framework.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ALXN1720 in Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amyloid Depleter ALXN2220 in Adult Participants With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)
An Open-Label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics (PK), Pharmacodynamics (PD), Safety, and Efficacy of Gefurulimab in Pediatric Patients (6 to < 18 Years of Age) With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) Who Express Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies (AChR+)
A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of ALXN2030 in Adult Patients With Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeaningful patient engagement requires understanding lived disease and healthcare experiences. This patient-centric approach is especially valuable when applied to the design and execution of clinical trials, as participation barriers may hinder trial recruitment, retention, and detection of meaningful outcomes. Patient engagement is particularly important in the study of treatments for rare diseases, where populations are small and geographically dispersed and there are few sites with relevant clinical expertise. Additionally, protocol amendments to address hurdles are expensive and can cause delays in trial activities, which can affect downstream regulatory approvals and access to treatments. Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, worked with patients and their stakeholders to identify points of additional trial burden and enable patient-driven changes before clinical trial protocol finalization.
methodsPatients, parents of pediatric patients, and patient advocacy group representatives with diverse experiences participated in virtual, study-specific perspective exchange sessions on 4 protocols (adults with generalized myasthenia gravis, pediatric patients with generalized myasthenia gravis, adults with antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation, and adults with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy). Participants discussed their disease journey, the protocol, and perceived barriers to clinical trial awareness, enrollment, participation, and follow-up through semistructured interviews.
resultsParticipants raised points about the eligibility criteria, study drug self-administration, visit frequency, participant mental health, and the relevance of specific outcome measures. In response, the study sponsor proactively changed the clinical trial protocols when feasible. Changes included expanding the eligibility criteria, developing an instructional video on self-administration of the study drug, and reducing the frequency of clinic visits. In addition, the sponsor created appreciation cards and trained trial sites on a standardized approach to help participants understand the goals of specific outcome measures.
conclusionsThese insights led to demonstrable, advocate-recommended changes in rare disease clinical trial protocols before study delivery, underscoring how early patient-partnered drug development can be meaningfully applied to research in rare diseases.
trial registrationNCT05556096, NCT06607627, NCT06744647, and NCT06183931. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.