ReviewBiomarker research2026
RNA N4-acetylcytidine modification in health and cancer: molecular mechanisms, cellular plasticity, and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
N⁴-acetylcytidine (ac⁴C) is an evolutionarily conserved RNA modification that was initially identified in transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Increasing evidence has subsequently expanded its functional landscape to messenger RNA (mRNA) and multiple classes of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). As the best-characterized ac⁴C writer in mammals, N-acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10) orchestrates RNA structure, stability, processing, and translation, thereby governing fundamental physiological processes, including ribosome biogenesis, translational fidelity, proteostasis, cell fate determination, hematopoiesis, reproduction, and embryonic development. Cancer cells exploit the NAT10-ac⁴C axis to selectively stabilize or enhance the translation of oncogenic transcripts, reprogram tRNA and rRNA-dependent translational programs, and cooperate with non-canonical NAT10 functions, including R-loop regulation, protein acetylation, and RNA binding, to sustain uncontrolled proliferation, cancer stemness, metabolic reprogramming, DNA damage repair, invasion and metastasis, resistance to regulated cell death, and immune evasion. Consequently, the NAT10-ac⁴C axis has emerged as a central molecular hub linking RNA fate, the translational machinery, and adaptive tumor reprogramming. Therefore, phenotypes resulting from NAT10 depletion or pharmacological inhibition should not be indiscriminately attributed to reduced ac⁴C deposition in the absence of catalytic rescue experiments and site-specific validation. In this Review, we comprehensively summarize the molecular basis of ac⁴C, its substrate landscape, catalytic mechanisms, and determinants of substrate selectivity, as well as its physiological functions in normal tissues and pathological roles in cancer. We further compare the shared and context-dependent mechanisms by which the NAT10-ac⁴C axis drives malignant progression and therapeutic resistance across diverse cancer types. In addition, we critically evaluate current ac⁴C detection technologies, the hierarchy of substrate evidence, NAT10 inhibitors, targeted protein degradation strategies, rational combination therapies, biomarker-guided patient stratification, and therapeutic windows. Finally, we propose that future research should move beyond broad NAT10 inhibition toward identifying tumor-specific NAT10 dependencies and selectively disrupting oncogenic NAT10-RNA regulatory circuits through high-confidence ac⁴C atlases, site-specific RNA editing technologies, and precision delivery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.