ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Identification of cognitive subtypes and risk networks in Chinese older adults: based on latent profile analysis and explainable machine learning.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional cognitive screening often relies on total scores, which can easily mask asynchronous impairment patterns across different cognitive domains. In particular, calculation ability, a sensitive indicator of executive function, is frequently misattributed to normal aging and overlooked clinically. This study aims to utilize data-driven methods to identify specific concealed cognitive phenotypes in the older population and deconstruct their underlying sociodemographic and clinical driving mechanisms.
methodsThis study included 7,159 older participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify latent cognitive subtypes based on three dimensions: orientation, calculation, and memory. Prediction models were constructed using Boruta feature selection and the Random Forest algorithm. Furthermore, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and Gaussian Graphical Models (GGM) were utilized to quantify the nonlinear contributions and network interactions of risk factors.
resultsLPA identified a unique cognitive impairment subtype termed Calculation-Dominant Impairment, accounting for 24.6% of the sample population. Although the majority of respondents were classified as cognitively intact (55.0%), this specific subgroup exhibited a disproportionately severe decline in calculation function (V-shaped deficit), while episodic memory was relatively preserved. The Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance in identifying this subtype (AUC = 0.781), significantly outperforming traditional linear models, and achieved high specificity (specificity = 0.960). Interpretability analysis revealed a pattern dominated by significant social determinants: education level and internet use were the primary predictors, with importance weights significantly exceeding those of somatic comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. Network analysis further confirmed that internet use acts as a critical "bridge node" connecting age and education level, exerting a potential cognitive reserve effect in mitigating calculation decline.
conclusionThis study defines a cognitive impairment subtype primarily driven by education poverty and digital exclusion, which is prone to be missed in routine memory-centric screenings. The findings suggest that biomedical interventions alone may be insufficient to prevent such decline; promoting digital inclusion among older adults should be regarded as a critical public health strategy to compensate for early-life educational deficits and prevent the decline of calculation and executive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.