ArticleBMC neurology2026
Elevated atherogenic index of plasma in multiple sclerosis: association with metabolic profile in a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neuroimmunological disorder characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neuroaxonal loss within the central nervous system. Recent evidence suggests that MS is not only a neuroimmune disease but also associated with systemic metabolic alterations. Furthermore, certain disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used in MS may influence lipid metabolism, leading to changes in serum cholesterol levels. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), calculated based on the triglyceride-to-high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio, is a sensitive biomarker reflecting atherogenic burden. This study aimed to evaluate AIP and lipid profiles in patients with MS and to investigate the relationship of AIP with clinical severity and treatment characteristics.
methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, 100 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 100 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included. Serum lipid parameters were measured, and AIP was calculated using the formula log10(TG/HDL). In addition to group comparisons, correlation analysis, AIP quartile analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. Patients were also stratified according to the DMTs used and their hepatic metabolic profiles.
resultsTotal cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and AIP levels were significantly higher in patients with MS compared to controls (all p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in HDL levels. AIP values were significantly elevated in the MS group (0.45 ± 0.26 vs. 0.37 ± 0.23; p = 0.020). The discriminative performance of AIP for MS was modest but statistically significant (AUC = 0.600, p = 0.015). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, AIP quartiles were independently associated with the presence of MS (OR = 1.356, p = 0.034). Quartile analysis demonstrated that increasing AIP levels were associated with higher total cholesterol and LDL levels and lower HDL levels (p < 0.05), while no association was found with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between AIP or lipid parameters and EDSS. No significant differences in AIP were observed among treatment groups.
conclusionElevated AIP and an atherogenic lipid profile in patients with MS support the presence of systemic metabolic and inflammatory components in the disease. The independent association between AIP and MS supports the presence of systemic metabolic and inflammatory components in the disease. However, the lack of association between AIP and EDSS suggests that AIP may reflect systemic inflammation and metabolic burden rather than clinical disability. The limited impact of DMTs on lipid profiles indicates that the observed metabolic alterations may be primarily disease-related. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to clarify the clinical utility of AIP in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.