ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: Mechanotransduction, Microenvironment, and Mechanisms Beyond Lesions.
Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis and adenomyosis are characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside its normal anatomical location and are associated with pain, infertility, and other clinical manifestations. Although they share pathogenic features, including inflammation, hormonal responses, immune dysregulation, and fibrosis, their clinical and histopathological phenotypes are highly heterogeneous. This review integrates tissue mechanics and mechanobiology with inflammation, hormonal signaling, oxidative stress, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis to propose a microenvironment-dependent framework for understanding lesion formation, maintenance, and progression. Direct measurements of tissue stiffness, including elastography, have been reported, but standardized comparisons among lesion types remain limited. Existing evidence suggests that tissue stiffening may affect cellular proliferation, invasion, fibrosis, and tissue remodeling through mechanotransduction pathways such as integrin signaling. However, much of this evidence derives from in vitro studies, experimental models, or other fibrotic diseases, and direct causal relationships in human endometriosis and adenomyosis remain insufficiently established. Conversely, chronic inflammation, recurrent bleeding, and ECM accumulation may contribute to both tissue stiffening and fibrosis, indicating reciprocal interactions between mechanical and biological processes. Thus, lesion phenotypes may reflect interactions among lesion origin, cell-intrinsic properties, and the local microenvironment. Mechanobiology may complement established inflammatory, hormonal, immune, and fibrotic concepts and provide hypotheses for understanding lesion heterogeneity and progression. Longitudinal, lesion-level studies integrating mechanical and biological parameters are needed to test these hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.