ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Scapular Morphology Assessment Pipeline for Glenoid Segmentation and Landmark Localization.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scapular morphology plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder disorders. However, current assessment methods primarily rely on manual annotation of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scans by clinicians, which are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inter-observer variability. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a deep learning-based open-source pipeline for automated scapular morphology assessment, aiming to improve accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical efficiency. Descriptive Laboratory Study; Level of evidence, 2. We retrospectively collected 793 CT images of the shoulder from 774 patients (mean age, 60.00 ± 18.62 years). A 2D U-Net model performed high-resolution glenoid segmentation (native-resolution axial CT slices, no down-sampling), and a 3D nnUNet model was employed to localize five anatomical scapular landmarks: trigonum spinae (TS), angulus inferior (AI), processus coracoideus (PC), acromion (AC), and angulus acromialis (AA). Model performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient and precision-recall metrics for glenoid segmentation and the Euclidean distance between the predicted and ground truth landmark position. This pipeline was designed as an automated open-source framework that can be readily integrated into clinical workflows or research environments through clinician-preferred user interface. The glenoid segmentation model achieved a 3D Dice coefficient of 98.46%, with a precision of 96.59% and a recall of 97.30%. The mean Euclidean localization error for the five scapular landmarks ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 mm. The entire assessment process took average 22.55 s per case. The proposed deep learning pipeline enables accurate, efficient, and reproducible assessment of scapular morphology. The proposed approach facilitates reliable and efficient diagnosis, offering a promising tool for clinical and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.