ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Understanding when mixture models effectively identify careless responding: Simulation and validity evidence.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER) in self-report questionnaires refers to responses provided without adequate attention to item content. Latent variable mixture models have recently been proposed as a promising approach for detecting and accounting for C/IER. This study systematically evaluates the performance of mixture modeling for C/IER detection. Using an exemplar mixture model that captures core features of existing approaches, we (a) investigated, via simulations, conditions that facilitate or impede separation between response patterns indicative of attentive versus careless responding and (b) examined the validity of interpreting the latent class variable as an indicator of C/IER in an empirical application. The simulation study assessed how questionnaire and item characteristics affect latent-class identification under different C/IER response patterns. Results indicate that reliable separation is achieved when scales comprise at least ten items, exhibit substantial threshold heterogeneity, and include both positively and negatively worded items. Empirical support for the C/IER interpretation of the latent class variable was obtained by reanalyzing a publicly available Big Five inventory data set collected across multiple platforms. Model-based classifications closely corresponded to alternative C/IER indicators that do not rely on response patterns, exhibited consistency across multiple scales, and were sensitive to platform-specific differences in C/IER prevalence. Overall, the results support mixture modeling as a viable approach for addressing C/IER under many conditions commonly encountered in applied research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.