ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Supporting Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Neurodivergence in Serious Illness Decision-Making.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodivergence and developmental disorders can influence how a patient interacts with their health, medical team, and the healthcare system overall. We present the case of a man with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who was referred to palliative care clinic for assistance in determining his decision-making capacity to defer treatment for his progressive prostate cancer. Though many validated tools exist to assist providers in discussions of serious illness, none is validated in populations with neurodivergence, who have specific needs and challenges. As this population of adults living with ASD ages, it will be essential to support their decision-making surrounding diagnostic tests and medical treatments. Through this case, we highlight key components to engage patients with neurodivergence in health-related decisions. These strategies include using visual aids, avoiding abstractions, maintaining a low-stimulation sensory environment, and involving key stakeholders (e.g., family members and/or caregivers) to support decision-making. We also highlight the complex impact of multiple comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions on healthcare decision-making, and the resultant need for careful thought and innovative communication strategies this necessitates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42855616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.