Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42855608›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Parental expectations for specific follow-up after pediatric intensive care stay: a prospective observational cohort study.

Alice Bailly, Michael Levy, Delphine Micaelli, Guillaume Mortamet, Julie Guichoux, Julien Gotchac, Olivier Brissaud, Judith Chareyre

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alice BaillyPediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. alice.bailly@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4544-2357
Michael LevyPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Strasbourg University Hospital, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Delphine MicaelliPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Robert-Debré University Hospital, University of Strasbourg, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Guillaume MortametPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, F- 38000, France.
Julie GuichouxPediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Julien GotchacPediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier BrissaudPediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Judith ChareyrePediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess parental expectations regarding specific follow-up after a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay, and whether these expectations differ according to pediatric post-intensive care syndrome (PICS-p) risk factors. We also explored differences across four patient profiles based on age, pre-existing conditions, and progression toward chronic illness. This study was a questionnaire-based, prospective observational cohort study within the PICU of a French teaching hospital. The study population consisted of all children discharged alive from the PICU between July 2023 and June 2024. One month after discharge, a survey was sent via text message to parents, assessing their perceptions of the post-PICU experience and follow-up needs. Among 107 children included, 68 parents (63.6%) reported a need for structured follow-up. Interest was higher among parents perceiving difficulties in their child (p = 0.02) or after longer PICU stays (p = 0.04). Most (99 parents, 92.5%) favored initiating medical follow-up within three months of discharge. No significant differences were observed between patient categories. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons.

conclusionEarly, structured, post-PICU follow-up should be implemented to address diverse family needs. Priority should be given to children with longer stays or significant psychological trauma. Follow-up should be individualized based on an initial assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children and families may experience physical, psychological, cognitive, and social sequelae after a PICU stay, but parental expectations regarding post-PICU follow-up remain poorly described. WHAT IS NEW: • Most parents favored early structured follow-up after PICU discharge, regardless of patient profile. Perceived psychological difficulties and longer PICU stays were associated with demand for follow-up.

Indexed as

AftercareIntensive Care Units, PediatricParentsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansInfantLength of StayMalePatient DischargeProspective StudiesAftercareFollow-upParentsPediatric intensive care unitPediatricsPost-intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.